Our Love Affair With Photos


This post first appeared in the Huffington Post in a slightly different form
Photos of the meal you’re eating, the dress you’re buying, a car crash on your street, the rash developing on your face — all examples of photos that will be deleted from your phone after they have served their purpose. Or not…recently a photo of a woman being shot at, a woman actually being murdered in Minneapolis, has once again changed the way we think about or use our phones. It’s a new development in our society. But is it always a good thing?
A Book About Facebook Photos and More
In his book, Terms of Service, Jacob Silverman, often referred to as a “thoughtful critic of our evolving digital lifestyles,” points out the negatives (excuse the pun) in our picture-snapping culture.
“Photos become less about memorializing a moment than communicating the reality of that moment to others.”
He develops this idea, claiming that often the purpose of the picture is not to capture the moment (as the photo above in Minneapolis did) but to express the personal anxiety we may feel about our modern lives.
Are others doing things more interesting, more fulfilling than we are?
Because THE PHOTO has truly entered into some timeless competition. Silverman claims, and I think he is right, that some party goers forget about experiencing fun in the hopes their photo on Facebook will instead announce: “YES, LOOK AT ME AND MY LIFE, I AM HAVING FUN.”
But besides the ability to possibly aid in convicting the perpetrator of a crime, we more often use our phones to create a CONTINUING STORY of our exciting lives.
It is interesting that in our current culture we feel the need not only to send photos of all that we do, what we eat, where we go, what we buy and who we are with — but to often go somewhere and practice mindfulness by listening to our breathing, so we can learn to live in the moment. Really?
So which is it? MINDFULNESS: living in the moment? How ironic. Do we even know what a moment is? To find an answer, let’s take a step back.
A BRIEF HISTORY of the PHOTO
How did we exist before the constant need to capture an action or some object in time and shout it to the world? There was the mind, then the thought. Yes, just the thought! Now let’s try to sort it out this way:
1. The purpose of a photo was to PRESERVE a human’s image so we would know that person, remember them. Previously, those with wealth sat for a portrait to be painted by either a really good artist or an itinerant one — thus the job got done, and we know what Elizabeth the First of England supposedly looked like, as well as George Washington etc. You get the picture!
2. Later, the purpose of a photo became its ability to record history. Yes, there are paintings of battles, coronations, but they took months. Photographs were immediate, allowed for a variety of views. We had Mathew B. Brady (May 18, 1822 – January 15, 1896) a photo-journalist and one of the first American photographers, whose name became synonymous with photos of the Civil War.
3. And as the decades progressed, the daguerreotype and the tintype gave way to a process where a dry gel on paper, film, replaced the photographic plate. Then the photographer could take photos without the clumsy boxes of plates and the toxic chemical previously needed.
Then, film was developed by George Eastman, of Rochester, New York. As early as 1888, Eastman’s Kodak camera was available to consumers. His slogan: “You press the button, we do the rest.” By 1901 the public could take photos using the famous Kodak Brownie, a great little camera that took pretty decent photos.
4. And that was truly the beginning — you didn’t need to hire someone to paint your portrait. Families framed photographs and hung them in their homes honoring grandparents, remembering weddings and births, helping the aching heart that missed those who were miles away. In some cultures, people took photos of their loved ones lying in coffins surrounded by flowers. But it was all about remembering. It was all about preserving and honoring the moment.
AN ADVERTISEMENT, A TALISMAN OF MEMORY —MINDFULNESS ANYONE?
In some ways, one could say that a GI having a photo of his sweetheart during World War II, or glancing at a photo taped to the flight deck while a pilot during conflict, contributed to mindfulness. The photo carried you away from the trauma and for brief moments you could be present to the person you loved. Photos were and for many are still a talisman of memory. Photos ignite thought.
But now there’s a plethora. Taking photos of things that are truly worthy of remembering, and combining that with things you might forget in 15 minutes — has changed our attitudes toward the photos themselves.
We take a photo…we delete. We worry about how we look, so we take and retake to get it right…we probably always had that worry, but film was costly and you didn’t SEE the photo until after it was developed. Photo phones changed that whole process, and truly changed what picture-taking meant in the moment. Because it’s not always a moment — it’s a photo saved or deleted in the moment until the right one, the photo you can PICTURE…comes along.
THE POLAROID or LET’S GET NAKED
Let’s not forget the Polaroid! It saved folks from the following scenario: you take your roll of film to the drugstore to be developed and when you return for it, you have to meet with a manager and maybe a policeman. (This happened to a friend of mine as recently as the 90’s. She took some photos of her children naked in the bathtub and too much anatomy was showing.)
But the Polaroid allowed people to take these photos — because they developed right there in your home. Now the concept of privacy isn’t even on anyone’s radar, and thus some young people have been labeled sex offenders because they were not aware of the dangers of clicking and sharing without thinking first. Those images could hardly fit into some nostalgia category or talisman of memory…Again — change, change, change.
So What of My Photo History?
My husband and I take photos, because we love our families, want to remember our life with them.
Photos of family should be protected and treasured, and I don’t think everyone needs to see them. I also don’t believe that we are that protected online. Silverman would probably agree with me. The jacket copy on his book reads: Social networking is a staple of modern life, but its continued evolution is becoming increasingly detrimental to our lives. Shifts in communication, identity, and privacy are affecting us more than we realize or understand… (consider) the identity-validating pleasures and perils of online visibility; also…our newly adopted view of daily life through the lens of what’s share-worthy; and the…(ability of ) social media platforms — Facebook, Google, Twitter, and more — to mine our personal data for advertising revenue…(invading our privacy)
In his recent address to the graduating class of Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, Ken Burns took the opportunity to reflect on past history while stressing the major points in his talk–fight to keep history from repeating itself and fight to change human nature for the better. While doing so, he took a swipe at Facebook and social media.
Do not allow our social media to segregate us into ever smaller tribes and clans, fiercely and sometimes appropriately loyal to our group, but also capable of metastasizing into profound distrust of the other…
He makes a very valid point. Possibly it’s time to reconsider what each photo means and how to use it, honor it. The fact of instant photos can be helpful…but also can be damaging. Maybe we need to think as we use this technology.
What do your photos mean to you? As a dear friend of mine once told me in her practical and knowing way: if your house catches on fire, grab your photos albums. Everything else can be replaced.
Well people, I guess you better take your phones!













